Efficient EMC: just two prototypes
How can design and testing for EMC (ElectroMagnetic Compatibility) be carried out so that the second prototype already passes the tests?
is MSc EE ETHZ, hardware-, system- and safety-specialist and co-owner of Solcept. His previous professional activities were in the commercial field and in the development of medical and communication technology. Principles that guide him in development work are simplicity and safety. Samuel is an everyday cyclist, enjoys hiking and keeps fit with yoga.
How can design and testing for EMC (ElectroMagnetic Compatibility) be carried out so that the second prototype already passes the tests?
How do you write requirements? Who should write requirements? What types of requirements are there? How useful are requirements? We answer these questions here.
UL 1998 is shorter and seems simpler than IEC 60730. Is that really the case? We have analyzed both standards.
What do you need to consider for a software FMEA? How does one make an efficient software safety analysis?
Does it make sense to use Sistema for deeeply embedded functional safety? We think yes, it can serve as a guide through ISO 13849.
How do you arrive at your own development processes / development workflows for functional safety? Does that even make sense? A discussion of the variants.
Projects? Ideas? Questions? Let's do a free initial workshop!