The flicker standard states that the EUT (Equipment Under Test) has to be operated during the test in a way which is the worst case state with respect to flicker.
If the EUT is operated in a (relatively) constant fashion during the whole test, Plt = Pst will result. If this state is is feasible and realistic this means Pst has to fulfill the limits for Plt (which are lower!)
A purely analytical calculation of Pst is almost impossible, so we have developed FlickerSim and made it available open-source.
However, formulas for the first estimation of the expected Pst values are given in the standard [2]:
n = number of load changes in the observation interval
Tp = duration of the observation interval in seconds
F = shape factor (1 for step-wise voltage changes)
d = relative voltage change relative dU / U
In [2] there are also shape factors for different curve forms.
Flicker is one of the most underestimated areas of EMC, especially since flicker can affect the entire system, i.e. both hardware and software.
We develop electronics and systems with flicker in mind from the very beginning.
Patrik Jourdan
Do you have additional questions? Do you have a different opinion? If so, email me or comment your thoughts below!
| [1] | IEC 61000-4-15, Testing and measurement techniques – Flickermeter – Functional and design specifications, Edition 1.1, 2003-03 |
| [2] | IEC 61000-3-3, Limits – Limitation of voltage changes, voltage fluctuations and flicker in public low-voltage supply systems, for equipment with rated current 16 A per phase and not subject to conditional connection, Edition 2.0, 2008-06 |
| [3] | Wikipedia: Flicker |
| [4] | Wilhelm Mombauer: „Messung von Spannungsschwankungen und Flickern mit dem IEC-Flickermeter”, ISBN 3-8007-2525-8, VDE-Verlag |
Projects? Ideas? Questions? Let's do a free initial workshop!
No Comments